Review | Published: 27 December 2020

Bio-genesis and deregulation of circular ribonucleic acid and their role in human cancer

Rajakishore Mishra*

The Applied Biology & Chemistry Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Article number: 10 (2020)

Abstract

RiboNucleic Acid (RNA) occupies the center position in the central dogma of molecular biology. These are the nucleotide with a ribose sugar and are found either in linear or circular form. The linear RNAs are of different types and include ribosomal RNA (rRNA), messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (t-RNA), small nuclear (snRNA) RNA, and very small/micro RNA (microRNAs). The circular (circRNA) RNA is a group of noncoding RNA, stable molecules, established recently and linked with the regulation of different genes, RNAs including microRNAs. The current understanding of these molecules suggests that these circRNAs are fairly conserved and show tissue-specific expression patterns. These molecules are connected with different pathogenic conditions and associated with verities of diseases, including cancer. CircRNAs are thus contributing to tumorigenesis, and these molecules show the potential to become future predictive biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and even can be targeted in personalized therapy. Hence, these bio-molecules will get exposed frequently, and their new cellular role will emerge, soon. This review outlines the current trend, limitations, and future potential of circRNA in cancer research.

Keywords

cancer; cancer hallmarks; circRNA; circRNA biogenesis; circRNA function; circular RNA

1. Introduction

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) were initially reported nearly forty-five years ago [1]. Originally, circRNAs were considered as errors of the regular RNA splicing process with uncertain biological importance. Electron microscopy revealed the presence of circRNAs in the cytoplasmic compartment of eukaryotic cells [2]. Of late thousands of genes are reported to produce these highly conserved, stable, and closed RNA circles. These new cellular roles for these circRNA molecules and these bio-molecules are recognized for their active role in gene expression and regulation [3]. These molecules are also found essential for normal cellular differentiation and tissue homeostasis. Often their deregulations are correlated with various disease pathogenesis [4-6].

CircRNAs are single-strand RNA molecules, and these do not get translated. As evident from literature, these circRNAs are not directly expressed via transcription, from cellular genes. But these are highly stable molecules with a long half-life in comparison to many other RNAs. These circRNAs are also lacked their open ends (5’ and 3’) and thus protected against exonucleolytic degradation. Furthermore, circRNAs are steady-state byproducts of mRNA (Fig. 1A) splicing [7] and are generated through defective and/or regulated alternative splicing. Evidence from other studies suggests that circRNAs are functionally important and well conserved. Many of the circRNAs found in humans were also detected as circularised orthologous exons in mice. These were found to be conserved in the codons (third position), in comparison to the exons that are not located in the circRNAs [5]. Biogenesis of circRNA begins with the base (nucleotide) pairing of 2 introns complementary to one another. Since the splice sites from these exon(s) approach close and facilitate the back splicing and biogenesis of the circRNAs (Fig. 1B), millions of circular noncoding RNAs can be produced from thousands of coding (protein) genes with non-canonical splicing. It is the splicing machinery that determines whether to generate a circRNA or a linear mRNA. Alteration of cis-regulatory (DNA/ RNA) elements (like the protein-interactive motifs or the inverted repeats), a small number of trans-acting RNA-interacting factors such as Adenosine Deaminase RNA Specific (ADAR), quaking, RNA binding protein (FUS), Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L (HNRNPL), and DExH-Box Helicase9 (DHX9) can influence circRNA regulation and expression and has been reported in various cancer types [8]. Chemical modifications of RNA (i.e. N6-methyladenosine, N1-methyladenosine, 5-methylcytosine, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, pseudo-uridine, and inosine-to- adenine editing) are central in the control of non/coding RNA stability/ activity and frequently altered in cancer.

Figure 1: The biogenesis and function of circRNAs. (A) Hetero nuclear (hnRNA) RNA of most human genes with distinct exons, introns (equipped with long flanking sequences), inverted repeat elements (IRE), repetitive DNA sequences (RDS) and often found with trans-acting RBPs (RNA Binding Proteins). (B) Biogenesis of different types of circRNAs occur through back-splicing, and the long flanking introns with inverted repeat elements (IRE; like Alu-elements) and trans-acting RBPs enhance this process. During back-splicing, an upstream branch point (towards 5’end) attacks a downstream site, which then attacks an upstream site resulting in the formation of (a) exonic circRNAs and (b) an exon-intron circRNAs (as shown). Besides, circRNAs can be generated from splicing intermediates aka lariat precursors. The exon-skipping event during linear splicing produce (c) a circRNA with a functional exon; or from intronic lariat precursors (escape from the debranching step) (d) a circRNA without functional exon. (C) CircRNA can act as (a) microRNA decoys/ sponges, and that trap different miRNA/ alter mRNA stability, (b) can bind to RBP and thus act as protein-decoys/sponges, (c) as protein scaffolds, facilitating the co-localization of enzymes and their substrates, and/or (d) participate in gene regulation program, binding to ribosomes (affecting translation; circRNAs with IRES elements and AUG sites can be translated), RNA polymerase-II complex with U1-snRNP (affecting transcription), recruit specific proteins (to certain loci/sub-cellular compartments/ promoter region) for host gene regulation.

The gene-regulatory functions of many of the circRNA are lately open up with clarity. The uniqueness and role of individual circRNAs for the regulation of RNA dynamics were well recognized after the "microRNA sponge" function [9]. For example, ciRS-7 contains more than seventy conserved binding sites for miR-7. Hence these are considered as circRNA sponge [10, 11]. Several circRNAs reported with miRNA (microRNA) sponging properties, while the majority circRNAs show diverse functions. Bio-genesis of circRNA and their regulation appears to be complex. A lot of circRNAs are synthesized because of a back-splicing reaction that covalently joins the 3′-end of an exon to an upstream 5′-end [12]. The bio-genesis of many circRNAs become possible with reverse complementary Alu repeats edging the circularized exons [13].

Furthermore, circRNA biogenesis is promoted by the deregulation of splicing factors recruitment to cis-acting splicing-regulatory elements (Fig. 1). These splicing factors recruitment promote the back-splicing reaction to occur. Furthermore, an exon with lariat precursor can be formed by an exon-skipping event also reported for the bio-genesis of circRNA. The internal splicing (removal of intronic sequence) of the lariat can produce a circRNA [14]. The circRNAs can be synthesized from the transcription of many fusion genes that are produced by the chromosomal translocations, including in promyelocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. All these were named fusion-circRNAs [15]. All the above-mentioned information highlights the biogenesis of circRNAs.

To date, several circRNAs are observed in different types of human cancer [16]. Those include but not limited to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [17], lung cancer [18], colorectal carcinoma [19], breast cancer [20], prostate cancer [21], bladder [22], ovarian [23], kidney cancer [24], gastric cancer [25], head and neck cancer/ oral cancer (HNSCC/ OSCC) [26, 27], hematological malignancies [28] and tumors of the central nervous system [29]. All this evidence underscores the importance of cirRNA in cancer pathogenesis and treatment. Here the roles of different circRNAs in cancer have been discussed. This review gathers information on circRNAs and their role in the origin and progression of cancer besides their potential as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarkers.

2. Circular-RNA and their cellular function

As mentioned earlier, these circRNAs are single-strand and do not get translated. However, some circRNAs possess AUG sites and Internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements, for ribosome entry and initiation of translation. Only a few circRNAs found translated in different cell types are known, to date [30]. These circRNAs can have a completely different role and they might be free from their parental genes. Recently, a web-based tool has been reported for circRNA interactome study and known as ‘CircInteractome’. This was developed for mapping the miRNA-interaction sites and/ or the RNA-binding proteins binding sites located on circRNAs [31]. The longer half-life of circRNAs in comparison with other linear RNA molecules proposes its regulatory function. Several pieces of evidence found a correlation between circRNAs and numerous cellular processes, including miRNA decoys, protein decoys, protein scaffolding, splicing, and transcription process.

CircRNAs are well appraised for their stability feature since these molecules lack free ends and thus offers protection against exonucleolytic degradation. However, many circRNAs were observed with specific endonuclease sites, and those could be cut open to performing other functions. For example, a well-conserved site to miR-671 promotes precise cleavage of ciRS-7 (circRNA) by the endonuclease enzyme Ago2 [32]. The elevated expression of ciRS-7 with stability has been reported in different human tissues. CiRS-7 can act as a miR-7 sponge and prevent its activity. Like this, many miRNAs/ circRNAs balance may affect several oncogenes/ tumor suppressors gene expression/ stabilities involved in different human cancers. The following section deals with many of the silent features of circRNA.

2.1 CircRNAs regulates miRNA

CircRNAs are acknowledged as the key regulators of different miRNAs. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are exceptionally uncommon, at the circRNA-miRNA interaction sites. This suggests a strong selection pressure to conserve these circRNA-miRNA binding regions in evolution. Different circRNAs harbor one or many miRNA-binding sites. Other circRNAs offer interaction sites for many different miRNAs or even control the entire family of miRNA/s. Since the miRNAs are well-recognized gene/mRNA regulators, the regulation and sponging activity of circRNAs are thus vital. Recent reports find only a limited number of circRNAs exist with several complementary sites for a particular miRNA. The presence of circRNAs in many organisms; those lack RNA interference pathways has also been observed [33]. All this evidence suggests that circRNAs may have some other cellular role (than regulating just miRNAs, pseudogenes, and linear long noncoding RNAs or functioning as miRNA decoy). miRNAs found associated with the regulation of numerous oncogenes/ tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) in various human cancers. For example, a circRNA originated from the CCDC66 gene found with different miRNAs binding/ complementary sites that target oncogenes/ TSGs [34]. Further, circFoxo3 offers several miRNA-binding sites and traps the miRNAs, and prevent them from degrading the linear host transcript [35]. Additionally, circHIPK3 is linked with miRNA decay function [36], and circPVT1 is found with sponging activity of several tumor-suppressor miRNAs, including let-7b [37]. All these pieces of evidence strongly suggest much circRNAs play a role as miRNA decoy in cancer.

2.2 CircRNAs regulate RNA interacting protein function

Some circRNAs possesses binding sites so that one or many RBPs (RNA-binding proteins). This characteristic makes them qualify as protein decoys too. The mbl locus /sites in a circRNA offer the MBL (homolog of muscleblind-like protein 1) protein binding. The circRNA that bind to MBL get prevented from other targets [38, 39]. Further, the MBL protein can attach to the introns flanking the circularized exon and promote its own (circRNA) bio-genesis [40]. It has also been reported that HuR binds to circPABPN1 (a PABPN1 gene-derived circRNA). The binding of HuR to circPABPN1 sequester out HuR from its binding to PABPN1 mRNA and impede its translation [41]. HuR also regulates different miRNAs, including the tumor-suppressor miRNA i.e., miR-7 [41]. The circANRIL plays as a protein sponge or decoy for PES-1 (Pescadillo homologue-1). CircANRIL binds to PES-1, a crucial 60S pre-ribosomal assembly factor and prevent exonuclease driven pre-rRNA processing. This leads to the ribosome and subsequent activation of p53 [42]. Similarly, circ-Foxo3 acts as a protein sponge for (mouse double minute 2 homolog) MDM2 and p53 (to prevent ubiquitylation of FOXO3) and thus regulates apoptosis in cancer cells [43]. Hence, the circRNAs can act like protein decoy and contributes to the tumorigenesis process (Fig. 1C).

2.3 CircRNAs and their effect on splicing and transcription

The majority of circRNAs are located in the cytoplasmic compartments, and many of these molecules are also located in the nucleus [38]. These nuclear circRNAs may affect nuclear events like transcription and splicing. Recently, the exon-intron circRNAs were found interacting with RNA polymerase-II and with U1 snRNP, which regulates the transcription of respective parental genes [44]. Many circRNAs communicate via specific RNA-RNA interaction (between U1 snRNA and exon-intron circRNAs) and actively participate in the gene expression/ transcription program [45]. These circRNAs may promote alternative splicing and direct modulation of transcription, and by interfering with splicing mechanisms [46]. Besides, the circular intronic RNAs (ciRNAs) ci-ankrd52, found accumulates near transcription site, and associates with RNA Polymerase-II mediated regulation of gene transcription. This suggests how parent coding genes can be regulated with the help of noncoding intronic cis-regulatory transcripts [47].

3. CircRNA and acquisition of cancer hallmark properties

Over the years, several circRNAs have been associated with cancer [46, 48]. Till date, nearly ten important cancer hallmarks have been proposed (Fig. 2A-J) and circRNAs are involved in each one of these hallmarks. Cancer cells receive mitogenic signal and active their proliferation agenda aka ‘sustaining proliferative signaling’. The circFoxo3 recruits p21 (a cell cycle inhibitor) and CDK2 (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-2), thus prevent CDK2 activity and halt the cell cycle [35]. On the other hand, circITCH and circMTO1 have been linked with cell cycle and cell proliferation program [49, 50]. ‘Evading growth suppressors’ is another cancer hallmark. CircRNA, circZNF292, has been found to halts cell cycle progression/cellular transformation and acts like a tumor-suppressor [51]. ciRS-7 inhibits miR-7 causing cell proliferation and rapid cell division by enhancing the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [52].

Cancer cells activate invasion and metastasis property. Many circRNAs are linked with the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway [53] that promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cell migration. Recently, many circRNAs including, circCCDC66, circKCNH1, circHIAT1, and circZKSCAN1 have been identified, with tumor metastases [54]. Furthermore, various cancer cells achieve immortality with the help of some circRNAs. For example, a circRNAs recruit both MDM2 and p53 and establish a functional interaction, that leads to p53 ubiquitination and degradation [43]. Besides this increased circFoxo3 recruits more MDM2 and hence decreased their (MDM2-Foxo3) interaction and degradation of Foxo3 [43, 55]. The Foxo3 also controls Puma and Bax expression and control cell death agenda. Furthermore, circRNAs originated from TTBK2 (circTTBK2) and UBAP2 (circUBAP2) have been exposed to inhibit apoptosis and achieve immortalization [56].

Cancerous tumors form new blood vessels and thus induce angiogenesis. CircZNF292 and circMYLK have also been linked with hypoxia/ vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and VEGFR2 signaling pathways that promote angiogenesis [57, 58]. Cancerous cells impair their cell death and survive longer. circFoxo3 has been linked with an anti-apoptosis program [43]. The increased circFoxo3 recruits more MDM2 and hence decreased their (MDM2-Foxo3) interaction and degradation of Foxo3 [43, 55]. Furthermore, many cancer cells escape from host immunity (Evading immune destruction). circRNA do also play an important role in tumor immunity and are recently considered for tumor immunotherapy [59, 60]. The cancerous cells are prone to genomic instabilities and mutation. ‘Alu’ elements are also found to be mutagenic, acts as splice acceptor promoting genomic instability. These Alu elements and their associated molecules like DHX9 alters many circular-RNA-producing genes and the number of circRNAs [61]. The reprogramming cellular energetics is another cancer hallmark. Recently the circACC1 found causing 5’AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation and thus qualify for cancer cells metabolic reprogramming [62]. Tumor promoting inflammation is commonly observed in tumors. Cancer-related inflammation is an essential hallmark, and recent works support the role of several circRNAs (like circ-NT5C2 and circRNA-002178 and hsa_circ_0005519) in cancer [63]. Though this small list of examples described above found the association of circRNA with each type of cancer hallmarks (Fig. 2); with discoveries in the near future, this list will grow and may cover more areas.

Figure 2: Circular RNAs and their link with diverse cancer hallmarks. Here, few examples provided which suggest each of the cancer hallmarks like (A) Sustaining proliferative signaling [35, 49, 50]; (B) Evading growth suppressors [51, 52]; (C) Activating invasion and metastasis [53, 54]; (D) Enabling replicative immortality [43, 56]; (E) Inducing angiogenesis [57, 58]; (F) Resisting cell death [43, 55]; (G) Evading immune-destruction [59, 60]; (H) Genomic instabilities and mutation [61]; (I) Reprogramming cellular Energetics [62]; (J) Tumor promoting inflammation [63] are driven by several circ-RNA, as discussed in the text.

4. Aberrant expression of circRNA in different human tumor

CircRNAs are differentially expressed in a variety of human tumors, including solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Here, some of the important findings have been presented in table 1.

Table 1: Aberrant expression of different circRNA in diverse cancer types

5. Prospect of circRNA in neoplastic diseases

Current developments suggest the presence of circRNAs can affect different gene regulation, cell signaling, and thus participate in cellular transformation. Evidence has been accumulated supporting the circRNAs connection with cell proliferation, EMT, tumor angiogenesis, apoptosis, and even drug resistance. The understanding of circRNAs biology in neoplastic diseases is still at a primitive state [3, 33]. There is a lack of evidence (pre/ clinical) that support the benefit of targeting these oncogenic circRNAs. However, oncogenic circRNA appear to be smart targets for cancer treatment though some bottlenecks need to be addressed.

Foremost, the targeting of these tumor-specific circRNAs should be cautiously performed, so that other transcripts inside the cell will not be affected. The knockdown of onco-circRNA can be possible with the help of various molecular tools [108]. siRNA/ shRNA approach can be utilized to target the exceptional back-splice junction of oncogenic circRNAs [108, 109]. Antisense oligonucleotides (AS-ON) that are complementary to back-splice signals of the pre-mRNA can interfere with the back splicing junction [110]. With the help of these abovementioned tools (i.e. siRNA/ AS-ON), the flanking intronic Alu repeats/ trans-acting splicing factors binding sites the back splicing can be prevented [111].

Further, the induced expression of tumor-suppressor circRNA in cancer cells can be beneficial. This tumor-suppressor circRNA and artificial circRNAs can be designed and introduced in cancer cells with the help of the gene therapy method [112]. Care should be taken for this because the introduction of foreign circRNA can stimulate interferon driven chaos [113].

Further, circRNAs transcriptional program can be rewired with the design of the RNA Polymerase-II driven cell-specific promoters [114]. More understanding of circRNA in gene regulation can be beneficial for cancer therapy. CircRNA can be used as a molecular tool for the controlled regulation of different biomolecules like miRNA, RNA, and proteins. These molecules can be used to rectify the signaling network in cancer and may bring back regular cell functioning or may support cell death. CirRNA is quite stable and thus, can be exploited as a vector for cancer therapy [115]. With their assistance, different therapeutics can be delivered to target cancer-causing pathways.

The alterations of circRNAs are reported, but the exact mechanism is elusive in cancer. Alternative splicing and miRNA expression are regulated by spliceosomes [116]. Mutations in many of these genes like U2AF1, SF3B1, and SRSF2 have also been reported in cancer [117], those need to be identified. Similarly, mutations of spliceosome genes and other trans-acting factors, like Quaking (QKI), can control the biogenesis of different circRNAs [118] should be identified for therapeutic purposes. Current evidence suggests an abnormal expression of QKI on diverse human cancers, including lung cancer. Hence, the altered expression/ regulation of circRNAs observed in cancer may be due to genetic or/and epigenetic changes of numerous upstream regulatory genes, and those need to be thoroughly checked before designing personalized cancer therapy.

The regulation of circRNA turnover is also not well understood. Some of the circRNAs are observed in several body fluids and thus have great potential to become a biomarker for disease monitoring. The functional role of circRNAs can be further analyzed in different types of body fluids, such as serum/blood and saliva, which is important if they are to be used as non-invasive biomarkers. Finally, recently, there are some excellent reviews in this field and maybe referenced for more information [71, 119-121]. In conclusion, circRNA investigation is still at a primitive stage, and their role in cancer is just beginning. The circRNAs show potential not only as a precious cancer biomarker but also can be served as possible targets for cancer therapy in the future.

References

[1] Sanger HL, Klotz G, Riesner D, Gross HJ, Kleinschmidt AK (1976). Viroids are single-stranded covalently closed circular RNA molecules existing as highly base-paired rod-like structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA; 73(11):3852-3856.

[2] Hsu MT, Coca-Prados M (1979). Electron microscopic evidence for the circular form of RNA in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. Nature; 280(5720):339-340.

[3] Kristensen LS, Andersen MS, Stagsted LVW, Ebbesen KK, Hansen TB, Kjems J (2019). The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nature Review Genetics; 20(11):675-691.

[4] Wang Y, Liu J, Ma J, Sun T, Zhou Q, Wang W, et al (2019). Exosomal circRNAs: biogenesis, effect and application in human diseases. Molecular Cancer; 18(1):116.

[5] Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, et al (2013). Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature; 495(7441):333-338.

[6] Lei K, Bai H, Wei Z, Xie C, Wang J, Li J, et al (2018). The mechanism and function of circular RNAs in human diseases. Experim Cell Res; 368(2):147-158.

[7] Chen LL, Yang L (2015). Regulation of circRNA biogenesis. RNA Biology; 12(4):381-388.

[8] Wilusz JE (2015). Repetitive elements regulate circular RNA biogenesis. Mobile Genetic Elements; 5(3):1-7.

[9] Thomson DW, Dinger ME (2016). Endogenous microRNA sponges: evidence and controversy. Nature Review Genetics; 17(5):272-83.

[10] Barrett SP, Parker KR, Horn C, Mata M, Salzman J (2017). ciRS-7 exonic sequence is embedded in a long noncoding RNA locus. PLoS Genetics; 13(12):e1007114.

[11] Li RC, Ke S, Meng FK, Lu J, Zou XJ, He ZG, et al (2018). CiRS-7 promotes growth and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via regulation of miR-7/HOXB13. Cell Death Disease; 9(8):838.

[12] Chuang TJ, Chen YJ, Chen CY, Mai TL, Wang YD, Yeh CS, et al (2018). Integrative transcriptome sequencing reveals extensive alternative trans-splicing and cis-backsplicing in human cells. Nucleic Acids Research; 46(7):3671-3691.

[13] Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, et al (2013). Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. RNA; 19(2):141-157.

[14] Kelly S, Greenman C, Cook PR, Papantonis A (2015). Exon Skipping Is Correlated with Exon Circularization. J Mol Biol; 427(15):2414-2417.

[15] Guarnerio J, Bezzi M, Jeong JC, Paffenholz SV, Berry K, Naldini MM, et al (2016). Oncogenic Role of Fusion-circRNAs Derived from Cancer-Associated Chromosomal Translocations. Cell; 165(2):289-302.

[16] Vo JN, Cieslik M, Zhang Y, Shukla S, Xiao L, Zhang Y, et al (2019). The Landscape of Circular RNA in Cancer. Cell; 176(4):869-881 e13.

[17] Li X, Ding J, Wang X, Cheng Z, Zhu Q (2020). NUDT21 regulates circRNA cyclization and ceRNA crosstalk in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene; 39(4):891-904.

[18] Chen L, Nan A, Zhang N, Jia Y, Li X, Ling Y, et al (2019). Circular RNA 100146 functions as an oncogene through direct binding to miR-361-3p and miR-615-5p in non-small cell lung cancer. Molecular Cancer; 18(1):13.

[19] Zeng K, Chen X, Xu M, Liu X, Hu X, Xu T, et al (2018). CircHIPK3 promotes colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by sponging miR-7. Cell Death Disease; 9(4):417.

[20] Zhang HD, Jiang LH, Sun DW, Hou JC, Ji ZL (2018). CircRNA: a novel type of biomarker for cancer. Breast Cancer; 25(1):1-7.

[21] Xu H, Sun Y, You B, Huang CP, Ye D, Chang C (2020). Androgen receptor reverses the oncometabolite R-2-hydroxyglutarate-induced prostate cancer cell invasion via suppressing the circRNA-51217/miRNA-646/TGFbeta1/p-Smad2/3 signaling. Cancer Letters; 472:151-164.

[22] Xie F, Li Y, Wang M, Huang C, Tao D, Zheng F, et al (2018). Circular RNA BCRC-3 suppresses bladder cancer proliferation through miR-182-5p/p27 axis. Molecular Cancer; 17(1):144.

[23] Wang J, Wu A, Yang B, Zhu X, Teng Y, Ai Z (2020). Profiling and bioinformatics analyses reveal differential circular RNA expression in ovarian cancer. Gene; 724:144150.

[24] Chen Q, Liu T, Bao Y, Zhao T, Wang J, Wang H, et al (2020). CircRNA cRAPGEF5 inhibits the growth and metastasis of renal cell carcinoma via the miR-27a-3p/TXNIP pathway. Cancer Letters; 469:68-77.

[25] Tang W, Fu K, Sun H, Rong D, Wang H, Cao H (2018). CircRNA microarray profiling identifies a novel circulating biomarker for detection of gastric cancer. Molecular Cancer; 17(1):137.

[26] Zhu X, Shao P, Tang Y, Shu M, Hu WW, Zhang Y (2019). hsa_circRNA_100533 regulates GNAS by sponging hsa_miR_933 to prevent oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Cell Biochem;120(11):19159-71.

[27] Verduci L, Ferraiuolo M, Sacconi A, Ganci F, Vitale J, Colombo T, et al (2017). The oncogenic role of circPVT1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is mediated through the mutant p53/YAP/TEAD transcription-competent complex. Genome Biology; 18(1):237.

[28] Lin Z, Long F, Zhao M, Zhang X, Yang M (2020). The role of circular RNAs in hematological malignancies. Genomics; 112(6):4000-4008.

[29] Shi F, Shi Z, Zhao Y, Tian J (2019). CircRNA hsa-circ-0014359 promotes glioma progression by regulating miR-153/PI3K signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Comm; 510(4):614-620.

[30] Yang Y, Wang Z (2019). IRES-mediated cap-independent translation, a path leading to hidden proteome. J Mol Cell Biol; 11(10):911-919.

[31] Dudekula DB, Panda AC, Grammatikakis I, De S, Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M (2016). CircInteractome: A web tool for exploring circular RNAs and their interacting proteins and microRNAs. RNA Biology; 13(1):34-42.

[32] Hansen TB, Wiklund ED, Bramsen JB, Villadsen SB, Statham AL, Clark SJ, et al (2011). miRNA-dependent gene silencing involving Ago2-mediated cleavage of a circular antisense RNA. EMBO J; 30(21):4414-4422.

[33] Patop IL, Wust S, Kadener S (2019). Past, present, and future of circRNAs. EMBO J; 38(16):e100836.

[34] Hsiao KY, Lin YC, Gupta SK, Chang N, Yen L, Sun HS, et al (2017). Noncoding Effects of Circular RNA CCDC66 Promote Colon Cancer Growth and Metastasis. Cancer Res; 77(9):2339-2350.

[35] Du WW, Yang W, Liu E, Yang Z, Dhaliwal P, Yang BB (2016). Foxo3 circular RNA retards cell cycle progression via forming ternary complexes with p21 and CDK2. Nucleic Acids Research; 44(6):2846-2858.

[36] Li Y, Zheng F, Xiao X, Xie F, Tao D, Huang C, et al (2017). CircHIPK3 sponges miR-558 to suppress heparanase expression in bladder cancer cells. EMBO Reports; 18(9):1646-1659.

[37] Panda AC, Grammatikakis I, Kim KM, De S, Martindale JL, Munk R, et al (2017). Identification of senescence-associated circular RNAs (SAC-RNAs) reveals senescence suppressor CircPVT1. Nucleic Acids Research; 45(7):4021-4035.

[38] Ashwal-Fluss R, Meyer M, Pamudurti NR, Ivanov A, Bartok O, Hanan M, et al (2014). circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Molecular Cell; 56(1):55-66.

[39] Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, et al (2013). Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature; 495(7441):384-388.

[40] Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, Chen L, Lin M, Wang X, et al (2015). Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nature Struc Mol Biol; 22(3):256-264.

[41] Abdelmohsen K, Panda AC, Munk R, Grammatikakis I, Dudekula DB, De S, et al (2017). Identification of HuR target circular RNAs uncovers suppression of PABPN1 translation by CircPABPN1. RNA Biology;14(3):361-369.

[42] Hanan M, Soreq H, Kadener S (2017). CircRNAs in the brain. RNA Biology; 14(8):1028-1034.

[43] Du WW, Fang L, Yang W, Wu N, Awan FM, Yang Z, et al (2017). Induction of tumor apoptosis through a circular RNA enhancing Foxo3 activity. Cell Death Differentiation; 24(2):357-370.

[44] Huang C, Shan G (2015). What happens at or after transcription: Insights into circRNA biogenesis and function. Transcription; 6(4):61-64.

[45] Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, Chen L, Lin M, Wang X, et al (2017). Corrigendum: Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nature Struc Mol Biol; 24(2):194.

[46] Arnaiz E, Sole C, Manterola L, Iparraguirre L, Otaegui D, Lawrie CH (2019). CircRNAs and cancer: Biomarkers and master regulators. Semin Cancer Biol; 58:90-99.

[47] Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, et al (2013). Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell; 51(6):792-806.

[48] Shang Q, Yang Z, Jia R, Ge S (2019). The novel roles of circRNAs in human cancer. Mol Cancer; 18(1):6.

[49] Yang C, Yuan W, Yang X, Li P, Wang J, Han J, et al (2018). Circular RNA circ-ITCH inhibits bladder cancer progression by sponging miR-17/miR-224 and regulating p21, PTEN expression. Mol Cancer; 17(1):19.

[50] Ge Z, Li LF, Wang CY, Wang Y, Ma WL (2018). CircMTO1 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion by regulating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in colorectal cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 22(23):8203-8209.

[51] Jiang X, Wu X, Chen F, He W, Chen X, Liu L, et al (2018). The profiles and networks of miRNA, lncRNA, mRNA, and circRNA in benzo(a)pyrene-transformed bronchial epithelial cells. J Toxicol Sci; 43(4):281-289.

[52] Meng L, Liu S, Ding P, Chang S, Sang M (2020). Circular RNA ciRS-7 inhibits autophagy of ESCC cells by functioning as miR-1299 sponge to target EGFR signaling. J Cell Biochem; 121(2):1039-1049.

[53] Li YF, Zhang J, Yu L (2019). Circular RNAs Regulate Cancer Onset and Progression via Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Yonsei Med J; 60(12):1117-1128.

[54] Zhao ZJ, Shen J (2017). Circular RNA participates in the carcinogenesis and the malignant behavior of cancer. RNA Biology; 14(5):514-521.

[55] Lu WY (2017). Roles of the circular RNA circ-Foxo3 in breast cancer progression. Cell Cycle; 16(7):589-590.

[56] Zheng J, Liu X, Xue Y, Gong W, Ma J, Xi Z, et al (2017). TTBK2 circular RNA promotes glioma malignancy by regulating miR-217/HNF1beta/Derlin-1 pathway. J Hematol Oncol; 10(1):52.

[57] Yang P, Qiu Z, Jiang Y, Dong L, Yang W, Gu C, et al (2016). Silencing of cZNF292 circular RNA suppresses human glioma tube formation via the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Oncotarget; 7(39):63449-63455.

[58] Zhong Z, Huang M, Lv M, He Y, Duan C, Zhang L, et al (2017). Circular RNA MYLK as a competing endogenous RNA promotes bladder cancer progression through modulating VEGFA/VEGFR2 signaling pathway. Cancer Letters; 403:305-317.

[59] Meng L, Ding P, Liu S, Li Z, Sang M, Shan B (2020). The emerging prospects of circular RNA in tumor immunity. Annals Trans Med; 8(17):1091.

[60] Paramasivam A, Vijayashree Priyadharsini J (2020). Novel insights into m6A modification in circular RNA and implications for immunity. Cell Mol Immunol; 17(6):668-669.

[61] Aktas T, Avsar Ilik I, Maticzka D, Bhardwaj V, Pessoa Rodrigues C, Mittler G, et al (2017). DHX9 suppresses RNA processing defects originating from the Alu invasion of the human genome. Nature; 544(7648):115-119.

[62] Li Q, Wang Y, Wu S, Zhou Z, Ding X, Shi R, et al (2019). CircACC1 Regulates Assembly and Activation of AMPK Complex under Metabolic Stress. Cell Metabol; 30(1):157-173 e7.

[63] Song H, Liu Q, Liao Q (2020). Circular RNA and tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell Int; 20:211.

[64] Sand M, Bechara FG, Sand D, Gambichler T, Hahn SA, Bromba M, et al (2016). Circular RNA expression in basal cell carcinoma. Epigenomics; 8(5):619-632.

[65] Sand M, Bechara FG, Sand D, Gambichler T, Hahn SA, Bromba M, et al (2016). Long-noncoding RNAs in basal cell carcinoma. Tumour Biology; 37(8):10595-10608.

[66] Zhong Z, Lv M, Chen J (2016). Screening differential circular RNA expression profiles reveals the regulatory role of circTCF25-miR-103a-3p/miR-107-CDK6 pathway in bladder carcinoma. Scientific Reports; 6:30919.

[67] Nair AA, Niu N, Tang X, Thompson KJ, Wang L, Kocher JP, et al (2016). Circular RNAs and their associations with breast cancer subtypes. Oncotarget; 7(49):80967-80979.

[68] Liang HF, Zhang XZ, Liu BG, Jia GT, Li WL (2017). Circular RNA circ-ABCB10 promotes breast cancer proliferation and progression through sponging miR-1271. Am J Cancer Res; 7(7):1566-1576.

[69] Weng W, Wei Q, Toden S, Yoshida K, Nagasaka T, Fujiwara T, et al (2017). Circular RNA ciRS-7-A Promising Prognostic Biomarker and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14):3918-3928.

[70] Bachmayr-Heyda A, Reiner AT, Auer K, Sukhbaatar N, Aust S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, et al (2015). Correlation of circular RNA abundance with proliferation--exemplified with colorectal and ovarian cancer, idiopathic lung fibrosis, and normal human tissues. Scientific Reports; 5:8057.

[71] Kristensen LS, Hansen TB, Veno MT, Kjems J (2018). Circular RNAs in cancer: opportunities and challenges in the field. Oncogene; 37(5):555-565.

[72] Sand M, Bechara FG, Gambichler T, Sand D, Bromba M, Hahn SA, et al (2016). Circular RNA expression in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Sci; 83(3):210-218.

[73] Xia W, Qiu M, Chen R, Wang S, Leng X, Wang J, et al (2016). Circular RNA has_circ_0067934 is up-regulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and promoted proliferation. Scientific Reports; 6:35576.

[74] Su H, Lin F, Deng X, Shen L, Fang Y, Fei Z, et al (2016). Profiling and bioinformatics analyses reveal differential circular RNA expression in radio-resistant esophageal cancer cells. J Trans Med; 14(1):225.

[75] Zheng Q, Bao C, Guo W, Li S, Chen J, Chen B, et al (2016). Circular RNA profiling reveals an abundant circHIPK3 that regulates cell growth by sponging multiple miRNAs. Nature Comm;7 :11215.

[76] Li P, Chen H, Chen S, Mo X, Li T, Xiao B, et al (2017). Circular RNA 0000096 affects cell growth and migration in gastric cancer. British J Cancer; 116(5):626-633.

[77] Song X, Zhang N, Han P, Moon BS, Lai RK, Wang K, et al (2016). Circular RNA profile in gliomas revealed by identification tool UROBORUS. Nucl Acid Res; 44(9):e87.

[78] Barbagallo D, Condorelli A, Ragusa M, Salito L, Sammito M, Banelli B, et al (2016). Dysregulated miR-671-5p / CDR1-AS / CDR1 / VSNL1 axis is involved in glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget; 7(4):4746-4759.

[79] Bonizzato A, Gaffo E, Te Kronnie G, Bortoluzzi S (2016). CircRNAs in hematopoiesis and hematological malignancies. Blood Cancer J; 6(10):e483.

[80] Li W, Zhong C, Jiao J, Li P, Cui B, Ji C, et al (2017). Characterization of hsa_circ_0004277 as a New Biomarker for Acute Myeloid Leukemia via Circular RNA Profile and Bioinformatics Analysis. Int J Mol Sci; 18(3).

[81] Xu L, Zhang M, Zheng X, Yi P, Lan C, Xu M (2017). The circular RNA ciRS-7 (Cdr1as) acts as a risk factor of hepatic microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 143(1):17-27.

[82] Qin M, Liu G, Huo X, Tao X, Sun X, Ge Z, et al (2016). Hsa_circ_0001649: A circular RNA and potential novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biomarkers: Section A of Disease Markers; 16(1):161-169.

[83] Shang X, Li G, Liu H, Li T, Liu J, Zhao Q, et al (2016). Comprehensive Circular RNA Profiling Reveals That hsa_circ_0005075, a New Circular RNA Biomarker, Is Involved in Hepatocellular Crcinoma Development. Medicine; 95(22):e3811.

[84] Han D, Li J, Wang H, Su X, Hou J, Gu Y, et al (2017). Circular RNA circMTO1 acts as the sponge of microRNA-9 to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology; 66(4):1151-1164.

[85] Wan L, Zhang L, Fan K, Cheng ZX, Sun QC, Wang JJ (2016). Circular RNA-ITCH Suppresses Lung Cancer Proliferation via Inhibiting the Wnt/beta-Catenin Pathway. BioMed Research Int; 2016:1579490.

[86] Zhu X, Wang X, Wei S, Chen Y, Chen Y, Fan X, et al (2017). hsa_circ_0013958: a circular RNA and potential novel biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma. FEBS Journal; 284(14):2170-2182.

[87] Zhao W, Cui Y, Liu L, Qi X, Liu J, Ma S, et al (2020). Correction to: Splicing factor derived circular RNA circUHRF1 accelerates oral squamous cell carcinoma tumorigenesis via feedback loop. Cell Death Differentiation; 27(6):2033-2034.

[88] Li X, Zhang H, Wang Y, Sun S, Shen Y, Yang H (2019). Silencing circular RNA hsa_circ_0004491 promotes metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Life Sciences; 239:116883.

[89] Xia B, Hong T, He X, Hu X, Gao Y (2019). A circular RNA derived from MMP9 facilitates oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through regulation of MMP9 mRNA stability. Cell Transplant; 28(12):1614-1623.

[90] Pramanik KK, Nagini S, Singh AK, Mishra P, Kashyap T, Nath N, et al (2018). Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta mediated regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and its involvement in oral squamous cell carcinoma progression and invasion. Cell Oncol; 41(1):47-60.

[91] Su W, Sun S, Wang F, Shen Y, Yang H (2019). Circular RNA hsa_circ_0055538 regulates the malignant biological behavior of oral squamous cell carcinoma through the p53/Bcl-2/caspase signaling pathway. J Trans Med; 17(1):76.

[92] Alam M, Kashyap T, Pramanik KK, Singh AK, Nagini S, Mishra R (2017). The elevated activation of NFkappaB and AP-1 is correlated with differential regulation of Bcl-2 and associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma progression and resistance. Clin Oral Investig; 21(9):2721-2731.

[93] Deng W, Peng W, Wang T, Chen J, Qiu X, Fu L, et al (2019). Microarray profile of circular RNAs identifies hsa_circRNA_102459 and hsa_circRNA_043621 as important regulators in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep; 42(6):2738-2749.

[94] Kashyap T, Pramanik KK, Nath N, Mishra P, Singh AK, Nagini S, et al (2018). Crosstalk between Raf-MEK-ERK and PI3K-Akt-GSK3beta signaling networks promotes chemoresistance, invasion/migration and stemness via expression of CD44 variants (v4 and v6) in oral cancer. Oral Oncol; 86:234-243.

[95] Alam M, Kashyap T, Mishra P, Panda AK, Nagini S, Mishra R (2019). Role and regulation of proapoptotic Bax in oral squamous cell carcinoma and drug resistance. Head Neck; 41(1):185-197.

[96] Mishra R, Nagini S, Rana A (2015). Expression and inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 alpha/ beta and their association with the expression of cyclin D1 and p53 in oral squamous cell carcinoma progression. Mol Cancer; 14:20.

[97] Zhang H, Wang G, Ding C, Liu P, Wang R, Ding W, et al (2017). Increased circular RNA UBAP2 acts as a sponge of miR-143 to promote osteosarcoma progression. Oncotarget; 8(37):61687-61697.

[98] Jin H, Jin X, Zhang H, Wang W (2017). Circular RNA hsa-circ-0016347 promotes proliferation, invasion and metastasis of osteosarcoma cells. Oncotarget; 8(15):25571-25581.

[99] Wu Y, Xie Z, Chen J, Chen J, Ni W, Ma Y, et al (2019). Circular RNA circTADA2A promotes osteosarcoma progression and metastasis by sponging miR-203a-3p and regulating CREB3 expression. Mol Cancer; 18(1):73.

[100] Wu Z, Shi W, Jiang C (2018). Overexpressing circular RNA hsa_circ_0002052 impairs osteosarcoma progression via inhibiting Wnt/beta-catenin pathway by regulating miR-1205/APC2 axis. Biochem Biophy Res Comm; 502(4):465-471.

[101] Hu J, Wang L, Chen J, Gao H, Zhao W, Huang Y, et al (2018). The circular RNA circ-ITCH suppresses ovarian carcinoma progression through targeting miR-145/RASA1 signaling. Biochem Biophy Res Comm; 505(1):222-228.

[102] Zhang N, Jin Y, Hu Q, Cheng S, Wang C, Yang Z, et al (2020). Circular RNA hsa_circ_0078607 suppresses ovarian cancer progression by regulating miR-518a-5p/Fas signaling pathway. J Ovar Res; 13(1):64.

[103] Chen Y, Ye X, Xia X, Lin X (2019). Circular RNA ABCB10 correlates with advanced clinicopathological features and unfavorable survival, and promotes cell proliferation while reduces cell apoptosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Biomarkers: Section A of Disease Markers; 26(2):151-161.

[104] Wu DM, Wen X, Han XR, Wang S, Wang YJ, Shen M, et al (2018). Role of Circular RNA DLEU2 in Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Mol Cell Biol; 38(20):e00259-18.

[105] Zhou J, Zhou LY, Tang X, Zhang J, Zhai LL, Yi YY, et al (2019). Circ-Foxo3 is positively associated with the Foxo3 gene and leads to better prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia patients. BMC Cancer; 19(1):930.

[106] Cao HX, Miao CF, Sang LN, Huang YM, Zhang R, Sun L, et al (2020). Circ_0009910 promotes imatinib resistance through ULK1-induced autophagy by sponging miR-34a-5p in chronic myeloid leukemia. Life Sci; 243:117255.

[107] Liu J, Kong F, Lou S, Yang D, Gu L (2018). Global identification of circular RNAs in chronic myeloid leukemia reveals hsa_circ_0080145 regulates cell proliferation by sponging miR-29b. Biochem Biophy Res Comm; 504(4):660-665.

[108] Cui XL, Wang XD, Lin SK, Miao CM, Wu M, Wei JG (2019). Circular RNA circ_0067934 functions as an oncogene in glioma by targeting CSF1. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 23(19):8449-8455.

[109] Cao Q, Shi Y, Wang X, Yang J, Mi Y, Zhai G, et al (2019). Circular METRN RNA hsa_circ_0037251 Promotes Glioma Progression by Sponging miR-1229-3p and Regulating mTOR Expression. Scientific Reports; 9(1):19791.

[110] Holdt LM, Kohlmaier A, Teupser D (2018). Circular RNAs as Therapeutic Agents and Targets. Front Physiol; 9:1262.

[111] Panda AC, Grammatikakis I, Munk R, Gorospe M, Abdelmohsen K (2017). Emerging roles and context of circular RNAs. Wiley Interdisc Rev RNA; 8(2).

[112] Breuer J, Rossbach O (2020). Production and Purification of Artificial Circular RNA Sponges for Application in Molecular Biology and Medicine. Methods Protocols; 3(2).

[113] Liu CX, Li X, Nan F, Jiang S, Gao X, Guo SK, et al (2019). Structure and Degradation of Circular RNAs Regulate PKR Activation in Innate Immunity. Cell; 177(4):865-880 e21.

[114] Ahmed I, Karedath T, Al-Dasim FM, Malek JA (2019). Identification of human genetic variants controlling circular RNA expression. RNA; 25(12):1765-1778.

[115] Bai H, Lei K, Huang F, Jiang Z, Zhou X (2019). Exo-circRNAs: a new paradigm for anticancer therapy. Mol Cancer; 18(1):56.

[116] Chen W, Moore J, Ozadam H, Shulha HP, Rhind N, Weng Z, et al (2018). Transcriptome-wide Interrogation of the Functional Intronome by Spliceosome Profiling. Cell; 173(4):1031-1044 e13.

[117] Dvinge H, Kim E, Abdel-Wahab O, Bradley RK (2016). RNA splicing factors as oncoproteins and tumour suppressors. Nature Rev Cancer; 16(7):413-430.

[118] Conn SJ, Pillman KA, Toubia J, Conn VM, Salmanidis M, Phillips CA, et al (2015). The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell; 160(6):1125-1134.

[119] Lei B, Tian Z, Fan W, Ni B (2019). Circular RNA: a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for human cancers. Int J Med Sci; 16(2):292-301.

[120] Su M, Xiao Y, Ma J, Tang Y, Tian B, Zhang Y, et al (2019). Circular RNAs in Cancer: emerging functions in hallmarks, stemness, resistance and roles as potential biomarkers. Mol Cancer; 18(1):90.

[121] Li J, Sun D, Pu W, Wang J, Peng Y (2020). Circular RNAs in Cancer: Biogenesis, Function, and Clinical Significance. Trends Cancer; 6(4):319-336.

Acknowledgements

The author wants to acknowledge his teachers and mentors for what he learns from them in his career.

Funding

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None

Author information

Affiliations

Rajakishore Mishra

Department of Life Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Central University of Jharkhand, Ratu-Lohardaga Road, Brambe, Ranchi-835205, Jharkhand, India

Corresponding author

Rajakishore Mishra

E-mail: rajakishore.mishra@cuj.ac.in

ORCiD

Cite this article

Mishra R (2020). Bio-genesis and deregulation of circular ribonucleic acid and their role in human cancer. T. Appl. Biol. Chem. J; 1(2):83-94. https://doi.org/10.52679/tabcj.2020.0010

Received Revised Accepted Published

03 December 2020 20 December 2020 23 December 2020 26 December 2020

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52679/tabcj.2020.0010

Rights & Permissions

Copyright: © 2020 Rajakishore Mishra. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.